The decision not to investigate the broadcat was already questioned by the Ombudsman, Adam Bodnar and by the Open Republic. The Prosecutor’s Office has not found in the broadcast any evidence of unlawful acts.

” The election broadcast expressed a view on the influx of refugess in Polnad. It does not contitute an attempt to generate any particular emotions, such as hate. (…) The form and content of the spot in question do not call for, or encourage any unfriendly, or hostile acts” – wrote the Prosecutor’s Office spokesperson, Łukasz Łapczyński. He further argues that the freedom of debate includes the freedom to present opinions, hypothesis and forecasts in controversial matters. According to the spokesperson the freedom of public debate includes freedom to “inform about the real as well as supposed phenomena”.